子机构
400-600-1123
logo
备考资讯 提分课程 答疑社区
登录
注册
题库解析   >   主旨题 题型   >   OG19新题
本题由adminG提供
OG19新题

In recent years, Western business managers have been heeding the exhortations of business journalists and academics to move their companies toward long‐term, collaborative “strategic partnerships” with their external business partners (e.g., suppliers). The experts’ advice comes as a natural reaction to numerous studies conducted during the past decade that compared Japanese production and supply practices with those of the rest of the world. The link between the success of a certain well-known Japanese automaker and its effective management of its suppliers, for example, has led to an unquestioning belief within Western management circles in the value of strategic partnerships. Indeed, in the automobile sector all three United States manufacturers and most of their European competitors have launched programs to reduce their total number of suppliers and move toward having strategic partnerships with a few.

However, new research concerning supplier relationships in various industries demonstrates that the widespread assumption of Western managers and business consultants that Japanese firms manage their suppliers primarily through strategic partnerships is unjustified. Not only do Japanese firms appear to conduct a far smaller proportion of their business through strategic partnerships than is commonly believed, but they also make extensive use of “market-exchange” relationships, in which either party can turn to the marketplace and shift to different business partners at will, a practice usually associated with Western manufacturers.

【OG20-P410-482题】

The passage is primarily concerned with


    (A) examining economic factors that may have contributed to the success of  certain Japanese companies  

    (B) discussing the relative merits of strategic partnerships as compared with  those of market exchange relationships  

    (C) challenging the validity of a widely held assumption about how Japanese  firms operate  

    (D) explaining why Western companies have been slow to adopt a particular  practice favored by Japanese companies  

    (E) pointing out certain differences between Japanese and Western supplier  relationships  

登录申友雷哥GMAT,查看答案及解析

视频解析

暂无视频解析,点击获取更多视频内容

文字解析

答案:
C

文章结构

结构层次划分:

结构1:西方管理者听取建议采用“战略伙伴关系”

①建议来源: numerous studies

②link→ strategic partnership

③ automobile sector→  strategic partnerships

结构2:unjustified assumption

① 战略伙伴关系数量少

② market-exchange relationships



第1题 

这是一道主旨题,做主旨题一定要看结构句。

这篇文章共两段,第一段结构句指出西方管理者的态度,他们听取建议采取战略伙伴关系。第一段也是围绕着战略伙伴关系的正面态度展开。

而第二段的结构句指出作者的态度,研究表明有关日本公司采取战略伙伴关系的假设不合理,所以作者认为战略伙伴关系的影响并不都是正面的。第二段作者就从两个方面支持这个假设如何不合理:一是日本公司更少采用战略伙伴关系;二是他们使用市场交换关系。A选项,examining economic factors文章未提及,并没有具体的经济因素存在,文章也不是在检验因素。B选项,discussing the relative merits of strategic partnerships,作者对战略伙伴关系的态度为负,所以不会讨论它的好处,根据文章的Tone(语气,态度)可以排除这个选项。C选项,a widely held assumption about how Japanese firms operate 就是文章讨论的topic,战略伙伴关系,challenging the validity就是文章第二段的主要内容,也是文章的主要态度。所以这一题选C。D,文章没有解释西方公司在采取战略伙伴关系战略上行动迟缓。E,文章没有指出不同。所以选C

GMAT会员

提交
OG视频
申友雷哥GMAT小助手

添加官方小助手微信
了解更多GMAT考试与咨询

100蜜糖购买当前课程

当前蜜糖数:颗 去获取

立即购买 取消购买

吉祥物小蜜蜂

关注公众号

公众号

扫码关注申友雷哥GMAT公众号

立即获取12GGMAT核心资料

微信咨询

申友在线咨询二维码图片

扫码添加申友雷哥GMAT官方助手

立即咨询GMAT网课面授课程

联系申友雷哥 全国免费咨询热线:400-600-1123

Copyright © 2021 All Right Reserved 申友雷哥教育 版权所有 沪ICP备17005516号-3 免责声明 互联网经营许可证编号:沪B2-20210282